1 Mission Operations and TT&C Division, Bola Ahmed Tinubu Centre for Space Transport and Propulsion, LASU Epe Campus, Lagos, Nigeria.
2 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Lagos State University, Epe, Lagos, Nigeria
3 Rocket System Engineering Division, Bola Ahmed Tinubu Centre for Space Transport and Propulsion, LASU Epe Campus, Lagos, Nigeria.
* Corresponding Author
ORCID Details
Gbadebo Omoniyi Adeniyi: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1820-5966
Abdullateef Oluwatele Akobada: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7245-6000
Samuel Okemute Egwenu: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9005-4100
Olubukola Esther Olowu: https://orcid.org/ 0009-0001-0741-3356
Rukayat Yewande Soile: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3495-7295
Ibrahim Tope Adepoju: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8569-6724
International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2026, 20(03), 176–184
Article DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2026.20.3.1728
Received on 27 July 2026; revised on 05 September 2026; accepted on 07 September 2026
This paper presents the static test evaluation of two solid propellant rocket motors using a Baseline Formulation (BF) and a Modified Baseline Formulation (ModBF). The objective was to assess the effect of propellant modification on motor performance parameters. Both motors were tested with 1.0 kg of propellant under identical conditions. Results show that ModBF out performed BF across key metrics. ModBF achieved a maximum thrust of 573 N and an average thrust of 359.2 N, representing increases of 19.1% and 18.9% over BF, respectively. Total impulse and specific impulse for ModBF were 897.8 Ns and 91.52 s, compared to 815.7 Ns and 83.15 s for BF, indicating a 10.1% improvement in both. Burn time was slightly reduced from 2.7 s to 2.5 s, with burn rate increasing from 0.014074 m/s to 0.01520 m/s. Maximum chamber pressure also rose from 1.02 MPa to 1.21 MPa. The improved performance of ModBF is attributed to enhanced combustion efficiency and higher burn rate. These findings provide a validated basis for further optimization of indigenous solid propellant formulations for improved propulsion performance.
Solid propellant; Baseline formulation; Modified formulation; Static test; Thrust; Specific impulse; Burn rate; Rocket motor performance.
Preview Article PDF
Gbadebo Omoniyi Adeniyi, Abdullateef Oluwatele Akobada, Samuel Okemute Egwenu, Olubukola Esther Olowu, Rukayat Yewande Soile and Ibraheem Tope Adepoju. TAILORING SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT BALLISTIC RESPONSES THROUGH CHEMICAL ADDITIVES. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2026, 20(03), 176–184. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2026.20.3.1728.






