1 Master of Engineering Management, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA.
2 Master of Engineering Science, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA.
3 Master of Engineering in Civil Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA.
4 Construction Project Manager, Venus Group Inc., New York, NY, USA.
International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2026, 20(02), 119–131
Article DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2026.20.2.1545
Received on 27 June 2026; revised on 03 August 2026; accepted on 05 August 2026
Sustainable urban infrastructure requires continuous performance governance across planning, design, construction, operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation stages. Smart buildings, transportation facilities, drainage networks, foundations, retaining systems, and public infrastructure assets are often evaluated separately, limiting the ability of decision makers to assess long-term resilience and service reliability. This study proposes a Lifecycle Performance Governance framework for smart buildings and critical infrastructure within sustainable urban systems. The framework integrates infrastructure performance indicators, environmental exposure variables, geotechnical reliability factors, and construction delivery metrics into a structured governance process. A Lifecycle Performance Score (LPS) is developed using weighted indicators representing structural serviceability, environmental vulnerability, maintenance priority, drainage sensitivity, foundation reliability, construction complexity, and operational resilience. The framework also incorporates Digital Twin-inspired condition updating using assumed, simulated, or publicly available performance information. The analytical evaluation demonstrates that the proposed framework provides consistent lifecycle performance assessment and supports maintenance prioritization, rehabilitation planning, investment allocation, and governance decision-making across multiple infrastructure categories. The proposed framework addresses the identified research gap through an integrated lifecycle governance approach and supports sustainable management of smart buildings and critical infrastructure without relying on proprietary operational datasets.
Lifecycle Performance Governance; Smart Buildings; Critical Infrastructure; Sustainable Urban Systems; Digital Twin; Lifecycle Performance Score; Infrastructure Asset Management; Performance Assessment.
Preview Article PDF
Md Ismail Hossain, Minhajul Abedin Tajik, Md Shahriar Abdullah and Shaker Abdullah Al Morshed. Lifecycle performance governance for smart buildings and critical infrastructure in sustainable Urban Systems. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2026, 20(02), 119–131. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2026.20.2.1545.






