Designing automated audit mechanisms to evaluate compliance of generative AI platforms with federal authorship and ownership disclosure requirements.

Precious Mathias Omogiate *

Associate Counsel, Olayiwola Afalabi (SAN) & CO, Benin-city, Nigeria.
 
Review
International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2023, 10(02), 1536-1549.
Article DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2023.10.2.1099
Publication history: 
Received on 14 November 2023; revised on 24 December 2023; accepted on 28 December 2023
 
Abstract: 
The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms capable of producing original text, imagery, audio, and software artifacts has intensified regulatory concerns regarding transparency, authorship disclosure, and ownership accountability. Federal intellectual property and content authenticity policies increasingly require that organizations deploying generative AI indicate whether outputs were human-authored, machine-generated, or co-produced. However, current compliance enforcement relies heavily on voluntary disclosure and manual auditing, which are insufficient given the scale and rapid iteration of generative models. To address this gap, automated audit mechanisms are needed to continuously evaluate whether AI platforms adhere to authorship and ownership disclosure requirements across diverse content workflows. Such mechanisms must integrate provenance metadata capture at the point of generation, tamper-resistant lineage storage, and machine-interpretable attribution tags that persist across editing, export, and distribution pipelines. In addition, the audit system should include automated validation models that can detect undisclosed AI involvement through linguistic, statistical, or structural analysis of generated content, thereby providing a secondary verification layer. These capabilities must be interoperable with federal registry systems, enterprise compliance dashboards, and legal evidence repositories to support real-time monitoring and post-hoc dispute resolution. Implementing automated audit frameworks will reduce regulatory burdens, increase consistency of disclosure practices, and strengthen public trust in AI-mediated communication ecosystems. More broadly, these auditing mechanisms can support fair attribution practices, maintain integrity within creative and professional industries, and ensure that generative AI innovation progresses within a transparent and accountable regulatory environment.
 
Keywords: 
Generative AI Compliance; Authorship Disclosure; Automated Auditing; Provenance Metadata; Regulatory Enforcement; Ownership Accountability
 
Full text article in PDF: 
 
Copyright information: 

Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0