1 Department of Information Systems, School of Professional Studies, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri United States.
2 Department of Information Technology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, United States.
3 Project Management, School of Professional Studies, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri United States
International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2024, 13(01), 3294–3301.
Article DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.2068
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.2068
Received on 16 September 2024; revised on 27 October 2024; accepted on 30 October 2024
Effective communication is crucial for successful project management, yet challenges often arise due to diverse stakeholder preferences and the proliferation of communication tools. This study investigates the impact of age on communication tool preferences within project teams. Through a survey of professionals from various fields, we analyzed the communication tools used in their projects and their perceived effectiveness. Our findings reveal that age significantly influences tool preference, with younger generations favoring newer, more technologically advanced options, while older generations often prefer more traditional methods. To optimize communication in diverse project teams, project managers should carefully consider the age demographics of their team members and strategically select a combination of tools that cater to the preferences of all participants. By understanding these age-based preferences, project managers can foster more effective collaboration and enhance overall project outcomes.
Project Management; Communication; Information Technology (IT); Project lifecycle; Communication tools; Project team
Preview Article PDF
Kingsley Anyaso, Daniel Evana Ukene, Ikeoluwa Akanmu and Oyinlola Obafunsho. Leveraging technological tools in facilitating effective intergenerational communication in project management. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2024, 13(01), 3294–3301. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.2068






